The second round Epernay has left many people skeptical.
Two main topics were talked about them.
The first is the label of the list Jabbour.
To explain this first point, it is necessary to go back.
When a person decides to participate in a municipal election, the first party she MEETS is the prefecture (or sub-prefecture, for our case). Very quickly, it is oriented handbook for use by candidates 2008 municipal . It is a 40-page document comprising everything about the election in question.
From page 13 of this document, it is question of etiquette reported by each candidate when filing nomination . It is therefore understood quickly that it is necessary and essential to choose a label to its list.
Still, for evil-including, when filing the list, you get a two-sided sheet listing the tags in question.
side face, the list of labels for the leading candidate.
Tails, the list of labels for lists from the label's leading candidate.
Thus, when filing the list, we ask you to be in these lists and it is imperative as explained in the memo. And if you do not locate in these lists, we will explain clearly and unambiguously that the federal department of the interior will contact you.
And that is what happened to us Monday, February 18 at 13h the federal department of the Interior summoned us for our label.
And so our list was classified with the label "other" or "unclassifiable" that the media reflect usually "no label" as shown federal department of the interior.
In view of these considerations it therefore easily understood that if a list is assigned one or another label, it is because someone from that list (usually the head list) has given this label here at minsitère.
To join the list "for neighborhoods"
http://quartiers.blogspot.com/
Cont @ ct
against anyone but for the neighborhoods! 
0 comments:
Post a Comment