Survey results "for neighborhoods" Survey results established in the municipal elections in 2008 in Epernay list "For districts." Survey implemented by the list "for neighborhoods" of 18 February 2008 to March 21, 2008 via platform web and in print (market, bar "Recess"). The results of this survey were presented to Mr. Leroy and Mr Lefevre Friday, March 21 at the first council. data on respondents. 
1. Highways : status and securing roads and sidewalks, etc..
Mark 1 to 5 the roads in your neighborhood
1: very bad
2: bad
3: normal
4: good
5: very good
Subject controversial issue and municipal roads is predominantly (92 %) judged as bad or very bad. Different places are cited as a priority:
- Avenue Middelkerke (forthcoming because of the ORU Bernon)
- Place des Arcades
- Rue Charles Gounod
-
Bernon Street - Street Johannes Brahms
The problem of escape routes, use outside the town hall but used by residents is also asked: path Turkish cultural association, the dirt road from the street Johannes Brahms with ECOLL Belle valley, etc..
the deteriorating condition of some pavements obstructing the passage of prams is also emphasized.
2. Trade : diversity, accessibility, proximity, time, etc..
Mark 1 to 5 the shops in your neighborhood
1: very bad
2: bad
3: normal
4: good
5: very good
topic less controversial businesses depend heavily on the neighborhood for their notation. 36% of respondents do not see anything to say about it.
Thus, it ties and especially Belle Terre-Rouge who bemoan the lack of more trade, even if the store Bernon is claimed by some impatient.
3. Animation : associations, festival, competitions, etc..
Mark 1 to 5 the animation of your neighborhood
1: very bad
2: bad
3: normal
4: good
5: very good
The animation is also very poorly rated (81 % in poor and very poor), but its assessment is linked to the neighborhood. In
downtown is the lack of animation, which is pointed on Sunday, while in the neighborhoods is the absence of associational life or activities for young people who are denounced.
The implementation of a festival hip-hop/rock is suggested.
4. Accessibility: handicapped, disabled, bike, stroller, etc..
Mark 1 to 5 the accessibility of your neighborhood
1: very bad
2: bad
3: normal
4: good
5: very good
Unequal by neighborhood (29% of respondents n have nothing to say), access to streets or malls is designated as largely deficient in certain neighborhoods. The criticism
as accessibility for people with disabilities than for strollers (criticism on the implementation of some telephone booths which hinder the passage of strollers, for example).
5. Greenwatch : quality and quantity, etc..
Mark 1 to 5, the green spaces in your neighborhood
1: very bad
2: bad
3: normal
4: good
5: very good
If the amount of green space is often not questioned, the quality is often faulted because of rudeness due the problem of dog excrement
This problem of incivility is emerging as the most significant element of this survey, since it is denounced in questions 7 (cleanliness) and 8 (nuisance). Some people advocate
real sanctions against the dog excrement with the establishment of a systematic verbalization.
time to time, are reported trees too close to homes, whose foliage is blocking the light for Homes (St. Charles Gounod, for example). Is a factor to take into account the ORU Bernon which the Convention calls for "high stems plantations" to hide buildings, the aesthetic concern should not be against the comfort of residents.
6. Parking: quality, quantity, signs, etc..
Mark 1 to 5 on parking in your neighborhood
1: very bad
2: bad
3: normal
4: good
5: very good
Parking still an issue with a rating variable ( 29% no opinion) by neighborhood and even on streets or the place in the street.
In downtown, the ticket prices or the lack of places "guests" who pointed the finger at various specific locations in the city and limited (Avenue Paul Chandon, some squares of Bernon, etc..) Is the lack of space is emphasized.
Moreover, it should be noted that these problems, localized, parking facilities also pose security problems because the access roads are often dedicated to emergency parking. This can also be approaching the problem of incivility mentioned above.
7. Clean: dog excrement, rubbish dumps Wild, sorting, etc..
Mark 1 to 5, the cleanliness of your neighborhood
1: very bad
2: bad
3: normal
4: good
5: very good
Foremost among the concerns about cleanliness, is the problem of dog excrement that is most often cited.
This problem of incivility is emerging as the most significant element of this survey, since he is also emphasized in questions 5 (green space) and 8 (nuisance). Some people advocate
real sanctions against the dog excrement with the establishment of a systematic verbalization.
Deposits of wild waste are reported in various places including the passage Rondeau.
8. Nuisance: rudeness, insecurity, noise, circulation.
Mark 1 to 5 the nuisance in your neighborhood
1: many
2: Many
3: few
4: no worse than elsewhere, normal
5: no, nothing to say
Very variable by neighborhood, nuisances have a rating variable.
Here again the problem of dog excrement is often singled out.
This problem of incivility is emerging as the most significant element of this survey, since he is also emphasized in questions 5 (green space) and 7 (clean).
Generally, the first nuisance cited is the incivility that generates various noise (loud music, traffic of different motor vehicles under the windows, etc..) and cleanliness problems.
Occasionally, cited nuisance related to ongoing projects (ORU on Bernon, new construction next to the renovation that create a feeling of insecurity in some darkening access) or traffic.
Synthesis. The first concern of Sparnacien - sy and candidates were not wrong - is the road with 92% unfavorable opinion (bad to very bad) and 0% of favorable opinion. The movie arrives at destination areas immediately behind with 81% unfavorable opinion (bad to very bad) and 2% favorable opinion.
The position where the more positive view is that green spaces that despite the problem of dog excrement is credited with 17% of favorable opinion (against 57% unfavorable opinion or a negative scores lowest). The survey allows
also highlights various problems precisely located in the city on accessibility, parking and pollution.
The major concern that emerges from this survey is that antisocial behavior is discussed front questions 5 (green space), 7 (cleanliness) and 8 (nuisance) and more subtly on question 6 (parking).
To join the list "for neighborhoods"
http://quartiers.blogspot.com/ Cont @ ct
acrylic on canvas. 
Here I am a student again, and barely a month after school starts, here's the first fashion show the Isel-Mode which the early years, including myself, are participating by offering their "unusual" , carvings on the body that have as motto "neither fabric or thread, or sewing. 
expo "Posthumous" 
CALL TO ARTISTS 
